Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/68990
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Keating, Malcolm | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-24T08:55:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-24T08:55:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8221 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/68990 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), an approach to human thought and language that began with the work of Lakoff and Johnson (1980), claims that metaphor is not merely a linguistic phenomenon, but is implicated in structuring human thought. On this view, that people use words like "attack" and "defend" to describe argumentative moves demonstrates that they think of argument as a kind of war. This is opposed to the view that some words like "attack" are polysemous, sometimes meaning to engage in physical warfare and sometimes meaning to argue against a position. One implication of CMT is that nearly all human concepts are understood metaphorically, so that reasoning about argumentation turns out to involve concepts of war. | vi_VN |
dc.language.iso | en | vi_VN |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Philosophy East & West;Vol.70, No.02 .- P.395-423 | - |
dc.subject | Conceptual metaphor theory | vi_VN |
dc.subject | Metaphor | vi_VN |
dc.subject | Delusion | vi_VN |
dc.title | Metaphor or delusion? A mimamsaka's response to conceptual metaphor theory | vi_VN |
dc.type | Article | vi_VN |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophy East and West |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
_file_ Restricted Access | 6.51 MB | Adobe PDF | ||
Your IP: 18.217.32.71 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.