Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/68990
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKeating, Malcolm-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T08:55:55Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-24T08:55:55Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8221-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/68990-
dc.description.abstractConceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), an approach to human thought and language that began with the work of Lakoff and Johnson (1980), claims that metaphor is not merely a linguistic phenomenon, but is implicated in structuring human thought. On this view, that people use words like "attack" and "defend" to describe argumentative moves demonstrates that they think of argument as a kind of war. This is opposed to the view that some words like "attack" are polysemous, sometimes meaning to engage in physical warfare and sometimes meaning to argue against a position. One implication of CMT is that nearly all human concepts are understood metaphorically, so that reasoning about argumentation turns out to involve concepts of war.vi_VN
dc.language.isoenvi_VN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhilosophy East & West;Vol.70, No.02 .- P.395-423-
dc.subjectConceptual metaphor theoryvi_VN
dc.subjectMetaphorvi_VN
dc.subjectDelusionvi_VN
dc.titleMetaphor or delusion? A mimamsaka's response to conceptual metaphor theoryvi_VN
dc.typeArticlevi_VN
Appears in Collections:Philosophy East and West

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
_file_
  Restricted Access
6.51 MBAdobe PDF
Your IP: 18.217.32.71


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.