Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/69013
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Thomas D.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T01:39:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-25T01:39:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8221-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/69013-
dc.description.abstractFor perhaps obvious reasons, reticence is not likely to recommend itself as a category with which to perform cross-cultural studies in philosophy. Again, to risk stating the obvious, the theme of reticence would in this context concern what philosophical arguments and texts leave unsaid as well as explicitly advise an audience to leave unsaid. By fixing our attention to gaps, silences, and times where the subject is changed as well as when any of the advice above is explicitly recommended (moments of reticence), new insights on how philosophical clarification and ethical cultivation are performed will come into view.vi_VN
dc.language.isoenvi_VN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhilosophy East & West;Vol.70, No.03 .- P.679-698-
dc.subjectThe analectsvi_VN
dc.subjectWittgensteinvi_VN
dc.subjectPhilosophyvi_VN
dc.titleMoments of reticence in the analects and wittgensteinvi_VN
dc.typeArticlevi_VN
Appears in Collections:Philosophy East and West

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
_file_
  Restricted Access
5.32 MBAdobe PDF
Your IP: 3.139.104.59


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.