Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/69056
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJingxian, Liu-
dc.contributor.authorMao, Li-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-29T08:17:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-29T08:17:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8221-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/69056-
dc.description.abstractA dilemma in interpreting Hui Shi's ten theses is that they are understandable only in the light of relativistic pluralism, which conflicts with his own main theme of absolutistic monism. However, after a careful investigation of the evolutionary paths of the tense and aspect uses of the temporal adverb fang 方 in classical Chinese language, a construction argument can be made for fang sheng fang si 方生方死 But before presenting this construction argument, we first introduce the dilemma in interpreting the ten theses.vi_VN
dc.language.isoenvi_VN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhilosophy East & West;Vol.70, No.03 .- P.781-800-
dc.subjectHui shi's monismvi_VN
dc.subjectRelativistic pluralismvi_VN
dc.subjectA russellian interpretationvi_VN
dc.titleHui shi's monism: a russellian interpretationvi_VN
dc.typeArticlevi_VN
Appears in Collections:Philosophy East and West

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
_file_
  Restricted Access
4.88 MBAdobe PDF
Your IP: 3.133.134.123


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.