Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/71060| Title: | Inquiring into the corpus of empire* |
| Authors: | Doherty, Stephen Ford, Lisa Mckenzie, Kirsten Parkinson, Naomi Roberts, David Halliday, Paul Laidlaw, Zoe Lester, Alan Stern, Philip |
| Keywords: | Corpus linguistics Digital humanities British Empire |
| Issue Date: | 2021 |
| Series/Report no.: | Journay of World History;Vol.32, No.01 .- P.219-240 |
| Abstract: | This article tests the value of corpus linguistics in analyzing nineteenth- century commissions of inquiry into British colonies. It examines and improves the capacity of a computerized text analysis tool called the linguistic Inquiry and word count to identify word meaning, sentiment, and psycholinguistic constructs in nineteenth-century sources. By augmenting its dictionary with nineteenth-century language and cross checking meaning, we show that the software can code with 97% accuracy. We then demonstrate the tool’s potential to explore genres of colonial writing, and to locate emotive language and language relating to power differentials in commission reports, a function we argue may provide a “way in" to assessing how commissioners treated different kinds of British subjects and their testimony in the reports. |
| URI: | https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/71060 |
| ISSN: | 1045-6007 |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal of World history |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| _file_ Restricted Access | 3.7 MB | Adobe PDF | ||
| Your IP: 216.73.216.181 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.