Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/71129
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuldi, Jo-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T08:43:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-22T08:43:01Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1045-6007-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/71129-
dc.description.abstractFor many scholars who are not themselves historians of political thought, the major use of official records is as a benchmark for studying other kinds of development. Official records of modern political bodies are widely available in digitized form and provide one of the primary sources with which digital historians have trained their methods. This article applies the process of “reducing” textual expressions to regular form to investigate how British members of Parliament talked about empire in extremely general terms: which places did they mention, how much, and in what context. Reducing parliamentary speech to regular occurrences makes it possible to quantitatively generalize about regular and predictable structures for example, the Eurocentric bias of Parliament and Parliament’s bias toward portion of the empire under long command, with certain notable exceptions. The technique lends itself to a wide variety of other scholarly contexts.vi_VN
dc.language.isoenvi_VN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournay of World History;Vol. 32, No. 02 .- P.345-370-
dc.subjectDigital historyvi_VN
dc.subjectNetwork analysisvi_VN
dc.subjectBritish Empirevi_VN
dc.subjectWorld historyvi_VN
dc.subjectHistorical methodsvi_VN
dc.titleThe Official mind's view of Empire; in miniature: Quantifying World geography in Hansard's Parliamentary Debatesvi_VN
dc.typeArticlevi_VN
Appears in Collections:Journal of World history

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
_file_
  Restricted Access
4.02 MBAdobe PDF
Your IP: 18.191.223.30


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.