Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/71266
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPolinska, Wioleta-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-24T03:56:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-24T03:56:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn0882-0945-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ctu.edu.vn/jspui/handle/123456789/71266-
dc.description.abstractYale psychologist Paul Bloom is making a case against empathy when it comes to ethical deliberation and action. According to Bloom, emotional empathy has a dark side because it causes an in-group bias that leads to parochialism and racism. Our helping behavior is selectively aimed at those like us and, as a result, blinds us to the suffering in distant global settings. In arriving at his position, Bloom provides support from Buddhist philosophy and practice that make his argument even more relevant to multicultural and global dialogue. This paper offers response to Bloom's criticisms by unveiling the limits of cognitive approach that he recommends.vi_VN
dc.language.isoenvi_VN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBuddhist – Christian Studies;Vol.40 .- P.403-417-
dc.subjectEmpathyvi_VN
dc.subjectCompassionvi_VN
dc.subjectPrejudicevi_VN
dc.subjectBiasvi_VN
dc.subjectMindfulnessvi_VN
dc.subjectBuddhismvi_VN
dc.subjectProsocial workvi_VN
dc.subjectBurnoutvi_VN
dc.title“Empathy on Trial: Is empathy inherently biased?”vi_VN
dc.typeArticlevi_VN
Appears in Collections:Buddhist Christian studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
_file_
  Restricted Access
3.31 MBAdobe PDF
Your IP: 18.190.153.213


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.